upvote
It's a pretty egregious failure for the org because it controlled the conditions for it to happen.

The security guy is just the patsy because he actioned it.

They have obviously done this a million times before and now they got burned.

reply
Yes, this. That same engineer shouldn’t have a pocket nuclear trigger shaped just like their key fob, either. Humans are predictable.
reply
Pretty much the definition of a “career limiting event”
reply
It's either a a Career Limiting Event, or a Career Learning event.

In the case of a Learning event, you keep your job, and take the time to make the environment more resilient to this kind of issue.

In the case of a Limiting event, you lose your job, and get hired somewhere else for significantly better pay, and make the new environment more resilient to this kind of issue.

Hopefully the Wikimedia foundation is the former.

reply
In the average real world, the staff engineer learns nothing, regardless of whether they get to lose or keep their job. Some time down the line, they make other careless mistakes. Eventually they retire, having learned nothing.

This is more common than you'd think.

reply
They'll be fine, recruiters don't look this stuff up and generally background checks only care about illegal shit.
reply
Nobody is going to know who did this, so probably not career limiting in any major way.
reply
They named him in the support ticket linked here somewhere.

> sbassett

reply
[flagged]
reply
Is ok, the AI was going to replace them in a few weeks anyway.
reply