undefined

points

[-]

This is such a stale take. In the past 3 years I’ve worked on multiple products with AI at their core, not as some add-on. Just because the corpo-land dullards[0] can’t execute on anything more complex than shoehorning a chatbot into their offerings doesn’t mean there aren’t plenty of people and companies doing far more interesting things.

[0] In this case, and with heavy irony, including OpenAI, although it sounds like most of this particular snafu is due to a bug.

by saghm55 minutes ago|

parent|

[-]

> Most AI integration is like this.

>> This is such a stale take. In the past 3 years I’ve worked on multiple products with AI at their core, not as some add-on. Just because the corpo-land dullards[0] can’t execute on anything more complex than shoehorning a chatbot into their offerings doesn’t mean there aren’t plenty of people and companies doing far more interesting things.

I feel like this is just a disagreement of what "AI integration" means. You seem to agree that the trend they're describing exists, but it sounds like you're creating new products, not "integrating" it into existing ones.

by abustamam1 hours ago|

parent|

prev|

[-]

Kinda reminds me of crypto. There are certainly very interesting things happening in the crypto space. But the most visible parts of the crypto universe are the stupid parts (buying PNGs for millions, for example)

by thereticent13 minutes ago|

parent|

[-]

Genuinely curious, not being combative...what very interesting things have happened in the crypto space lately?

by LordDragonfang1 hours ago|

parent|

prev|

[-]

I mean, to be fair, both things can be technically true. There can be lots of interesting things being done, even while most can be low-effort garbage.

But this is just Sturgeon's Law (ninety percent of everything is crap), not an actually insightful addition to the discussion, and I very much agree it's a stale take.