Yeah, my setup is purely for my own security reasons and interests, so there's very little downside to my scorched earth approach.
replyI do, however, think that if there was a more widespread scorched earth approach then the issues like those mentioned in the article would be much less common.
In such a world you can say goodbye to any kind of free Wi-Fi, anonymous proxy etc., since all it would take to burn an IP for a year is to run a port scan from it, so nobody would risk letting you use theirs.
replyFortunately, real network admins are smarter than that.
Pretty much. I think there's also a responsibility on the part of the network owner to restrict obviously malicious traffic. Allow anonymous people to connect to your network and then perform port scans? I don't really want any traffic from your network then.
replyYes, there are less scorched-earth ways of looking at this, but this works for me.
As always, any of this stuff is heavily context specific. Like you said: network admins need to be smart, need to adapt, need to know their own contexts.
Do you feel coffee shop WiFi should require you to scan your passport to connect, or that it shouldn't exist at all?
replyNot OP, but the latter sounds pretty good actually, yeah. Never understood the free WiFi craze anyways. Just use cellular?
replyNot all of us have cell plans with hotspots ($$$), hotspots often have data caps, cell is often slower or congested, and there are some areas without cell signal. It's also kind of silly from a wider perspective to shove everyone onto the cellular network when most businesses have perfectly decent fiber internet nowadays.
replySure, I'm usually on hotspot, but I personally appreciate when businesses have wifi. Either way, there are always going to be shared networks somewhere.
And you should require your passport to get one of those?
replydeleted
replyIf you actually wanted your site or service to be accessible you’d run in to issues immediately since once IP would have cycled between hundreds of homes in a year.
replyIP based bans have long been obsolete.
No, no they haven't. A bad behaving network still has to answer to 2-3 bad IPs, and if it doesn't.. it's obsolete.
replyFor people that implement it there's less than three people who use it, or agencies supporting it
replyCGNAT? That's definitely not true. There are whole towns that have to share one IP address. They're mostly in the third world.
reply