Hacker News
new
past
comments
ask
show
jobs
points
by
idiotsecant
7 hours ago
|
comments
by
nozzlegear
3 hours ago
|
next
[-]
Haha, woops! I meant 60 beats per minute of course.
reply
by
kylecazar
6 hours ago
|
prev
|
[-]
60 bps is a fine HR, if you are implying it isn't
Edit: WHOOPSIE DAISY
reply
by
saltcured
28 minutes ago
|
parent
|
next
[-]
Yeah, 60hz isn't a pulse, it's a bass hum. It means you are a robot operating in the US and you have a poorly filtered power supply.
reply
by
toast0
6 hours ago
|
parent
|
prev
|
next
[-]
Heart beat is usually measured in bpm. All the charts top out at 200. 360 bpm is certainly problematic for a human.
reply
by
Marsymars
6 hours ago
|
parent
|
[-]
3600 bpm would be even more problematic.
reply
by
Bombthecat
4 hours ago
|
parent
|
[-]
Even techno would be slower :)
reply
by
zargon
6 hours ago
|
parent
|
prev
|
next
[-]
That's 3 times the heart rate of a hummingbird.
reply
by
rkomorn
5 hours ago
|
parent
|
prev
|
next
[-]
Upvoted for the edit. :D
reply
by
antonvs
5 hours ago
|
parent
|
prev
|
[-]
You’re thinking of
one
beat per second, i.e. 60 beats per minute. 60 bps is not possible, but if it were, it wouldn’t be survivable.
reply