We already could've done that before, just throw a HTML file on a HTTP server on a cheap VPS
replyThat's pretty much what atproto is, except it's typed JSON rather than HTML, and HTTP+WebSockets to allow aggregation.
replyI wrote more about how it works here if you're curious: https://overreacted.io/a-social-filesystem/
and I actually don't hate that bit (I really like lexicons, although I might have approached it in a different way) - what I hate is the aggregation layer. I know that it is possible to have an AppView-less atproto app (e.g. RedDwarf), but I feel like much of the ecosystem still defaults to the assumption that it will go through the Bluesky AppView.
replyUnrelated apps (https://leaflet.pub/, https://tangled.org/, http://semble.so/) don't go through Bluesky Appview (since they need aggregations of different kind of data). I think aggregation is the only model that can compete with centralized services on UX, but of course different apps would need different backends.
replyYou may be confusing the Relay, a protocol component run by Bluesky, with the Bluesky AppView
replyThis is like saying anyone can open a lemonade stand in Mogadishu.
reply