upvote
> Imagine trying to compile this on ARM 10 years ago

Cortex A57 is 14 years old and is significantly faster than the 9 year old Cortex A55 these RISC-V cores are being compared against.

So yes it's many years behind. Many, many years.

reply
SpacemiT K3 is on par with Rockchip RK3588. So, about 4 years behind ARM.

Tenstorrent Atlantis (first Ascalon silicon) should ship in Q2/Q3 and be twice as fast. About as fast as Ryzen5. So, about 5 years behind AMD.

But even the K3 has faster AI than Apple Silicon or Qualcomm X Elite.

Current trend-lines suggest ARM64 and RISC-V performance parity before 2030.

reply
I love the optimisim, but I do thimk your time line is little quick. It will be more like 10 years than 4.
reply
> SpacemiT K3 is on par with Rockchip RK3588. So, about 4 years behind ARM.

That'd be ~7 years behind, not 4. Cortex A76 came out in late 2018. Also what benchmarks are you looking at?

> Tenstorrent Atlantis (first Ascalon silicon) should ship in Q2/Q3 and be twice as fast. About as fast as Ryzen5. So, about 5 years behind AMD.

Which Ryzen 5? The first Ryzen 5 came out in 2017, which was a lot more than 5 years ago.

> But even the K3 has faster AI than Apple Silicon or Qualcomm X Elite.

Which isn't RISC-V. Might as well brag about a RISC-V CPU with an RTX 5090 being faster at CUDA than a Nintendo Switch. That's a coprocessor that has nothing to do with the ISA or CPU core.

> Current trend-lines suggest ARM64 and RISC-V performance parity before 2030.

L. O. fucking. L. That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works.

reply
This. While I doubt that there will be a good (whatever that means) desktop risc-v CPU anytime soon, I do think that it will eventually catch up in embedded systems and special applications. Maybe even high core count servers.

It just takes time, people who believe in it and tons of money. Will see where the journey goes, but I am a big risc-v believer

reply