upvote
Evolution happens both sides - you and the virus/bacteria trying to live off you.

One of the risks of an always on response, is if something evolves to evade it - you have nowhere to go.

It's why taking an antibiotic at breakfast everyday is not a good idea.

reply
Unless they are contributing to the survival of their offspring.
reply
It can work the other way, too. Your offspring may be more likely to survive if you stop consuming resources once they become viable.
reply
Are you sure that availability of resources was a limiting factor during a large part of human evolution?

ie what has driven human population growth - a fundamental change in availability of natural resources or a fundamental change in how humans exploited them?

I'd argue it's the latter, and that's driven by accumulated knowledge - and before writing - the key repository of that was - old people.

reply
Humans have selective adaptations to reduce resource competition between older and younger members of populations - examples are menopause and testosterone levels.

Part of the reason it benefited us that some but not all people become old is because people require more attention during two phases of their lives. Our biological evolution has prioritized care for the very young over the very old, with respect to a limit on resources (like attention), effectively until the modern age. In some cultures, for instance, those with teeth must pre-chew food for those without, or expected members to engage in ritual suicide at a certain age.

reply
Except humans are a social species and the bands of humans who survived were the ones with the behaviors which kept elders around because of their benefits to our capacity for social learning.
reply