upvote
No criticism from me towards apple or Anthropic. Both parties made their choice. Apple was late to the identity business and the other ships had already sailed.

Third party logins are an extension and a massive risk to any website that doesn't include email hosting.

We have see identity providers dissapear, and people may change their mind.

Easiest way is to register you rown domain and use it with an identity provider of your choice and be able to move it anywhere.

Otherwise we are a faceless citizen of a corporation that can handle access to our identity and everything attached to it without recourse or access to anyone.

reply
Bruh.

Are you seriously trying to justify offering Sign in with Google but not ALSO offer Sign in with Apple because of some contorted principle, the method which HELPS users maintain their privacy? What the actual f.

Antrhopic's UX is just trash, the worst of all the major AI products.

They have this "I'm special" syndrome where they think they can get away with doing shit weirdly and not offer basic features that everyone else does, and the reason why I never purchased any of their services again after the first month, and had to replace my payment info with a throwaway card because they wouldn't let me remove it, again unlike everyone else.

reply
I don't think it's hard to understand why a service would want to support Google as an identity provider but not Apple. Google is probably the most commonly used provider out there, at least outside of the enterprise space.
reply