I am only 50% certain that your idea is expanding on the satire, if not: project owners can provide dual licensing. I'm sorry if you are serious and didn't understand you.
replyYou need a legal contract with every contributor to be able to offer dual licensing. That's impractical for some types of projects
replyI was going to say "this is just a license"
replyLOL. Same here. But the footer disclaimer and testimonials gave it away immediately:
reply> "We had 847 AGPL dependencies blocking our acquisition. MalusCorp liberated them all in 3 weeks. The due diligence team found zero license issues. We closed at $2.3B." - Marcus Wellington III, Former CTO, Definitely Real Corp (Acquired)
> © 2024 MalusCorp International Holdings Ltd. Registered in [JURISDICTION WITHHELD].
> This service is provided "as is" without warranty. MalusCorp is not responsible for any legal consequences, moral implications, or late-night guilt spirals resulting from use of our services.
I almost lost it, didn't realize it was satire until I came back to these comments
replyIf you don't have any contributors, you could just directly relicense without rewriting the whole codebase. If you do, it would be rude to do this.
reply