Right. Which means it does exist. And the point of the article is to bring about self awareness of the phenomenon so that people can improve.
I think you have the same goal with your comment, but your style of communication needs work.
Ironically, I would argue you might benefit from caring a little about how others perceive you.
GGP says don't care about X because it's a social phenomenon, but frequently this position is a form of social identification.
You say: X might deeper than social, implying that social phenomena are not important. Thus agreeing with GP.
[edit: my position is pragmatic: If there's a broad or important phenomenon, your position on it should be individualized to the value of the phenomenon itself, not based upon some theory-of-origin category assignment.]