Right - fix the economy instead. Why should increasing efficiency cause people to have less resources - that makes no sense.
replyBecause there are people who live off rent (in a broad sense of this world), and there are people who live off selling their ability to work. Increased efficiency and productivity may or may not benefit the second kind of people, depending on whether they can sell their labour to be used for something else.
replySo instead of figuring out ways to limit the ability of people to live off rent, we want to ban beneficial things that people could extract rent from?
replyThis is like saying, "We don't like how landlords extract value from housing, so we are banning apartment buildings"
Banning AI does increase efficiency. It makes it more efficient for a working class family to afford to survive. What perverted definition of the word were you considering?
replyHow is this different from saying "Banning mechanical farm equipment does increase efficiency, it makes it more efficient for farm workers to afford to survive"
replyYou are fighting against productivity improvements when you should be fighting against people hoarding the benefits of productivity improvements.
That doesn't answer my question. My claim is that people working is efficient.
reply> Job loss is a horrible reason to ban something. Think about our history if we always did that.
replyThe US has continually set up protectionist policies to preserve a local workforce. Automotive manufacturers, the shipbuilding industry, etc.
These are bad things
replyCar dealerships would like a word.
replyAnother example why these types of laws make things worse for people.
reply