DeepL's next-gen translation model is LLM-based. LLMs are kind of translation models that have been generalized to serve other purposes. I think you're not wrong that there's still some value to older models, but if you actually care about translation quality you would use both. If you want to use the cheapest thing I don't think a dedicated translator like DeepL is going to be superior to the free tier of a frontier language model.

That's a really good question. Before, I was using Google Translate, which is not perfect. Now I'm using Claude and I think I tend to centralize my tools... Like before, when I was using both Google Search and Google Translate, now I just use Claude for a lot of thing.

Plus, I think Claude is a better model than the one used by Google Translate, but correct me if I'm wrong.

But you're right, DeepL should be perfect to do it, because is model is dedicated for translations !

unfortunately deepl is not free. i used to prefer it over google translate until it told me that i used it to much so i would be blocked for 18 days.

google translate on the other hand i suspect is using LLMs in the background because sometimes the translation is absolutely nonsensical.