upvote
I would start looking for a job at an AI-leaning firm.
reply
> another teammate added a length check to an input field, and his request was merged near instantly, even though it had zero unit testing

That sounds extremely reasonable though?

reply
Code that does not take a pre-existent unit test from failing to passing is by definition broken.
reply
i take it you’re meaning i’m the “treat every gun as if it’s loaded” sense and not actually
reply
No its not.
reply
" this team is incredibly cooked in the long term" they're not actually.

People like you are making sunk expenditures whilst the models are evolving... they can just wait until the models get to 'steady-state' to figure out the optimal workflow. They will have lost out on far less.

reply
it sounds like you might have wasted your team's time previously and now they don't trust the code you put up with a PR. Maybe you can do something to improve your relationship with them?

As a sidenote, I highly doubt they are cooked longterm. Using AI is not exactly skilled labor. If they want or need I'm sure they could learn patterns/workflows in like an afternoon. As things go on it will only get easier to use.

reply
Exactly. I find it hilarious that the people down-voted my comment.

Like yeah sorry... not everyone has to be a risk-taker. Many people like to observe and await to see what new techniques emerge that can be exploited.

reply