upvote

points

by WalterBright3 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby bulbar3 hours ago|
next
[-]
That's a very narrow view of the world. One example: In the past I have handled bilingual english-arabic files with switches within the same line and Arabic is written from left to right.

There are also languages that are written from to to bottom.

Unicode is not exclusively for coding, to the contrary, pretty sure it's only a small fraction of how Unicode is used.

> Somehow people didn't need invisible characters when printing books.

They didn't need computers either so "was seemingly not needed in the past" is not a good argument.

reply
upvoteby WalterBright56 minutes ago|
parent|
next
[-]
> That's a very narrow view of the world.

Yes, it is. Unicode has undergone major mission creep, thinking it is now a font language and a formatting language. Naturally, this has lead to making it a vector for malicious actors. (The direction reversing thing has been used to insert malicious text that isn't visible to the reader.)

> Unicode is not exclusively for coding

I never mentioned coding.

> They didn't need computers

Unicode is for characters, not formatting. Formatting is what HTML is for, and many other formatting standards. Neither is it for meaning.

reply
upvoteby pibaker1 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
> That's a very narrow view of the world.

But not one that would surprise anyone familiar with WalterBright's antics on this website…

reply
upvoteby WalterBright8 minutes ago|
parent|
[-]
At least my antics do not include insulting people.
reply
upvoteby jmusall2 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
The fact is that there were so many character sets in use before Unicode because all these things were needed or at least wanted by a lot of people. Here's a great blog post by Nikita Prokopov about it: https://tonsky.me/blog/unicode/
reply
upvoteby WalterBright3 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]

    Look Ma
    xt! N !
    e tee S
    T larip
(No Unicode needed.)
reply
upvoteby chongli2 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
Unicode is for human beings, not machines.
reply
upvoteby WalterBright52 minutes ago|
parent|
[-]
How does invisible Unicode text fit into that?
reply
upvoteby chongli2 minutes ago|
parent|
[-]
It's not text, it's control characters, which have always been in character sets going back to ASCII.
reply