upvote
I think the analogy is a bit inaccurate here when people are talking about automation.

Microwaves do one thing, but they do it reliably. Microwaves didn't affect the culinary industry because cooking is far more than just heating food, and many tasks are very difficult to automate. LLMs are more general-purpose - the average Joe is now relying on them as a source of truth, advice and mental work across the board. However, LLMs can't be guaranteed to always be reliable, it's all probabilistic. The threat of automation here is in taking away a lot of the less important or less complex work. Low impact + high precision (microwave) vs. high impact + low precision (AI)

reply
But a microwave does exactly what it says on the tin, every time, without fail.

LLMs require a lot more effort.

reply
Does it? The food's always cold in the middle and you have to stir it then run it again.
reply
Yes but it consistently gives you a hot plate of cold food...
reply
Lol thanks for your comment.
reply
Clearly, you have not tried my microwave's popcorn or defrost settings.
reply
how is it a great analogy? do microwaves improve as fast as AI has been?
reply
Yes, they did, back in their day.
reply