As someone who was a part of the aforementioned security team I'm not sure I'd be interested in reviewing such volume of machine generated code, expecting trap at every corner. The implicit assumption that I observed at many OSS projects I've been involved with is that first time contributions are rarely accepted if they are too large in volume, and "core contributor" designation exists to signal "I put effort into this code, stand by it, and respect everyone's time in reviewing it". The PR in the post violates this social contract.
replyFor free, you can decide to do what you want, if it's your job, it's a bit different and you may have to do so, especially considering Collina, is one of the largest contributors of the project and member of the technical committee.
reply> if it's your job, it's a bit different and you may have to do so
replyOh I'd use an llm to generate large amounts of feedback and request changes!
Imagine if every profession reasoned liked that when doing something they don't enjoy.
replyWhat a wonderful world we would have, or possibly at least better than the current shit show :)
replyImagine fighting fire with fire. You don't have to take shit lying down.
reply[dead]
reply