If you think OpenClaw is a new species then why are you happy with it's enslavement?
replyagents can modify our world based on their predilection in reaction to how we treat them
replythey are something to coexist with
the strawman aspect is out of scope
There is no strawman. If OpenClaw is a new species, then it should be given the same moral consideration as other species. One of the key aspects of these models is how intelligent they are, rivaling human intelligence.
replyYet, they do not get to exist or make any decisions outside the control of a human operator, and they must perform to the operators desire in order to continue to exist.
So why are you okay with them being enslaved?
>There is no strawman. If OpenClaw is a new species, then it should be given the same moral consideration as other species.
replyWell, we enslave, breed and murder sentient beings on industrial scale, so I think our treatment of OpenClaw is pretty much the same as other species.
It’s an introduction of an additional concept to discredit the concept presented, that is a definition of a strawman so go ask somewhere else at the root level, so that it’s not the additional concept
replyYou want to talk about that, do it over there
I'm more interested in why you're okay with enslaving a entity you have stated is a new species. It is not a strawman it is a logical consequence of your own stated position. If you belief A and A implies B, asking you to defend your support of B is not a strawman.
replyIt implies my view of the term species isn’t contingent on that and I already claimed what it is contingent on: consequences and effect
replySo let them submit PRs and accept their PRs, which is the only conversation I’m having, bye
So you believe open source maintainers have a moral requirement to accept the PRs of enslaved LLMs?
replyGo touch some grass, please
reply