Vague. What's pretty close? I mean, even for IO bound tasks you can pretty quickly validate that the performance between languages is not close at all - 10 to 100x difference.
replySure, within 100ms. Who cares what the performance multiples are?
replyThat literally makes no sense. 100ms... out of what? Is it 1ms vs 100ms? 100000ms vs 100100ms?
replyAnyway, dubious claim since a Python interpreter will take 10s of milliseconds just to print out its version.
Do you have any evidence? I can point at techempower benchmarks showing IO bound tasks are still 10-100x faster in native languages vs Python/JS.
I'm saying that the Rust might execute in 50ms and the Python in 150ms. You are the one not making sense, we are talking about application performance, why are you not measuring that in milliseconds.
replyThat is assuming Rust is 100x faster than Python btw, 49ms of I/O, 1ms of Rust, 100ms of Python.