upvote
A "fake" e-mail address is one that is not clearly tied to your real identity, citizen. There is no reason to use such non-identifying addresses unless you have something to hide. Comply, for the children.
reply
Maybe a "fake" email address in their terms is an impossibly invalid one, unowned one that cannot be verified, or a disposable verifiable one? I'm not sure.

Fun fact: Gmail address prefixes can optionally intercalate a period between any letters. All accounts though must be remain unique after normalizing case and removing all periods.

a.bc@ = ab.c@ = a.b.c@ = abc@, but only one of these can be registered.

reply
That is all email addresses, it’s part of the spec. Aside from broken implementations of course.

Periods are optional.

Edit: Woops yeah, meant pluses. Dots are somewhat common as optional these days but not universal.

reply
False, this is only with Gmail. And not even true for Gmail workspaces.
reply
He's talking about aliases, not independent email addresses.
reply
Which "spec"? Many specifications exist and not every MTA, mailbox, nor email client understands the latest and every implementation is guaranteed to have quirks, but here are the most common: RFCs 822, 2822, 4952, 5336, 6530. There is no the spec. Subaddressing isn't standardized, but there was a half-hearted RFC on that with too many extra features. How email user parts are interpreted is up to the MTA, mailbox, or email client. Plus subaddressing informally as a hack has existed since at least 2005 according to my rusty memory. It's, therefore, a de facto standard. Use it where possible to track down leaks of personal information, but it's likely to bite with some gotchas. I used to maintain a @{{name}}.name domain and email server where all emails went to a single catchall account without setup or subaddressing needed to disambiguate which source email correspondence was from.

> Dots are somewhat common as optional these days but not universal.

This handwaving tautology is meaningless.

reply
Are you sure you mean dots and not pluses?
reply