undefined

points

by glitchc4 hours ago |

comments

by spacechild12 hours ago|

[-]

There is no Qt "runtime". Qt is just a library.

> Native means system libraries only.

Every non-trivial application will eventually use third-party non-system libraries.

I think "Native app development" has at least two meanings:

1. narrow meaning: the program uses a native UI toolkit (Win32, Cocoa)

2. broad meaning: the program targets one or more specific platforms and the UI is not not just a webview

Even with the narrow meaning, WxWidgets would qualify as "native development" (because it uses native UI toolkits under the hood), yet it is still a third-party library.

by 2019843 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

>Native means system libraries only.

Since when? To me, anything not webview-based is native, though you have varying degrees of integration into the platform.

by Rohansi3 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

Why single out WebViews? Would you consider Flutter native? It renders widgets on its own just like a WebView does.

by jcelerier1 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

For me, native means "I can integrate a platform widget in the middle of it". For instance, with Qt, GTK or wxwidgets it's entirely possible to integrate a Win32 / Cocoa / X11 component right in the middle of your app (and it's super important for instance for things such as integrating audio plugins, where the plugin only gives you a HWND or NSView and you have to draw your application Chrome around it, have it follow resizes, etc.)

by mycall2 minutes ago|

parent|

[-]

So then flutter will let you do that, with a little elbow grease.

by 2019843 hours ago|

parent|

prev|

[-]

Most toolkits, including WebUI 3.0, render widgets on their own, so you can't distinguish just on that. I'd say anything written in an interpreted language is not native, and Javascript falls into that category. Dart at least is possible to compile ahead of time, and so is C#.

by debazel2 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

WebViews aren't written or rendered with interpreted languages either. It is also usually not Javascript that makes browser based apps so heavy. It is almost always the whole browser stack that is making them large and memory hungry, which is mostly written in C++.

You can also hook a WebView up directly to a low-level language and skip Javascript entirely, so does that mean Rust + WebView = Native?

by drnick13 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

I have always considered Qt apps (even for Windows) to be native. Think of VLC, VirtualBox, etc.

by userbinator12 minutes ago|

parent|

[-]

I'd consider them "naturalized"; close enough to native that you wouldn't notice any big differences, but there are still minor ones if you know what to look for.