Surprisingly no; it's pretty much a money sink where everybody goes bankrupt after a couple of years. It's why it's attractive to money launderers.
replyI'm not sure that's true for onlyfans, which seems to have been highly profitable until the sudden death of its founder.
replyExcellent point: I'm talking about pornography 1.0, as it were.
reply1.0 should be attributed to pornography _before_ online distribution, and I suspect that was pretty profitable
replyIsn't 1.0 before _photography_ rather?
replyDrawings then?
replyLive action
replyand now we're back to livecams, time is just a flat circle man...
reply