It's a rehashing of Leibniz's "Calculemus!".
replyIt's not a fully stupid idea, many rules can be automated and indeed have already been. The things that courts still have to decide manually are the leftovers that require more human judgment.
This pipe dream will soon be replaced by "let's have the first degree of judgment be ChatGPT; human judges should only deal with appeals".
replySounds like every self-driving startup
replyWhy is it a fantasy to have a fair system with no room for interpretation?
reply