upvote

points

by port300010 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby andrewl-hn9 hours ago|
next
[-]
> It's a social network that became socially acceptable to browse at work.

YMMV. I’ve heard a few stories where opened LinkedIn at work was treated as a massive red flag: “this person looks elsewhere, they are not committed to the company anymore”.

reply
upvoteby freeAgent8 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
It depends on your role. People in sales have it open all the time since it's a legitimate research tool for them.
reply
upvoteby matwood8 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Yep. Sales and biz dev people use LI constantly not necessarily for connecting, but learning about contacts.
reply
upvoteby layer86 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
If you’re considered valuable at your current company, instead of being a red flag it can help you get a raise or other benefits.
reply
upvoteby torginus7 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
This. I would rather post on any other social media site at work than Linkedin. It's a major signal that the person is looking for work.
reply
upvoteby kube-system1 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
I can’t imagine working in a place toxic enough where:

1. That’s the default presumption (rather than someone doing networking for their current role)

2. Where “looking for another job” is a point of contention

Any good senior engineer should be keeping in touch with others in the industry. And good teams are made up of people with good communication skills who want to be there.

reply
upvoteby siva74 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Especially the "Let me show you i have a open linkedin tab while screen sharing so you guys know i hate this place" move as if anyone cares.
reply
upvoteby whatevaa7 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
No more such thing as commit to the company in western world anymore. Companies are definitely not commited to you.
reply
upvoteby alsetmusic9 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
I've not understood why people wanted it to be a social network. That aspect always seemed bizarre to me until it had been true for long enough to stopped being strange. But this doesn't make sense to me either.

I wouldn't load the site at work because I wouldn't want to signal to my employer that I was looking for another job. I very deliberately didn't accept invites from management at my last employer (small company, ~25 people) until I didn't work there anymore. I wouldn't want them to get a notification if I suddenly revised my profile because maybe I'm shopping around for a new job, for example.

reply
upvoteby cjbgkagh9 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Microsoft wanted it to be a social network because they couldn’t buy Facebook. They did buy Yammer though.

A lot of the bad policies were implemented when getting LinkedIn ready for sale to boost the short term gains and maximize the sale price, once sold it was hard to reverse the policies in order to maintain a healthy market long term. They do kinda have a mini-monopoly / cornered market so they were able to milk that for money.

reply
upvoteby siva74 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Yammer was probably one of the most bizarre m&a stories ever.
reply
upvoteby Spooky239 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
The same reason there’s probably some dude pitching adding AI to notepad. Fad and fashion.

In the last 20 years “peer to peer”, “Uber for X”, “gamification” and now of course “AI” were the must have tech memes. Back in the day O’Reilly had a conference dedicated to the revolution of… XML.

Social was just another one. Now, even the social companies are kinda moving past social. It’s more about hoarding attention. But when Microsoft was shoveling money at Gartner, we had guys coming in dropping books about how the social enterprise would revolutionize business.

reply
upvoteby cyanydeez8 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
eh, that guy who pitched AI for Notepad was a product of M$lop push for AI everywhere. No one seriously though it needed AI, but if they're trolling for AI pitches, of course that's an easy target, it's already text based. GUI stuff is hard, but raw text?
reply
upvoteby Spooky238 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
I actually didn’t know that was a thing. I was trying to cook up something quick and absurd. Truth is stranger than fiction!
reply
upvoteby user_78329 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
> I wouldn't want them to get a notification if I suddenly revised my profile because maybe I'm shopping around for a new job, for example.

If I'm not mistaken, LinkedIn has options for all of this. You can edit your profile with or without a notification post. You can select "show open to being hired only to people outside your company".

Not that I have great (or any) love for the platform, but if I understood you right, these things aren't really issues.

reply
upvoteby mancerayder6 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Is it terrible if your employer finds that you're looking for another job? If they like you, maybe they'll intervene to make your life better?

If they hate you, they're less likely to go through a termination process including severance.

I used to always worry about them finding out. Now, I'm having trouble not blurting it out from the rooftops.

reply
upvoteby monsieurbanana9 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
I work remotely so I had no idea. I'd have thought that unless you're in HR you wouldn't scroll a website whose primary purpose is to look for new jobs.
reply
upvoteby mwexler7 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Much like X, it's what you choose to use it for. Papers are posted, approaches are debated, and loose groups form to align. It's easy to scroll past the pandering, but there is useful stuff in the dross.

But agreed, it is getting harder and harder to dig to the gems.

reply
upvoteby edgyquant7 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
That is not the primary purpose of LinkedIn though. It is used extensively by a class of people who are generally decision makers and those selling services to them.
reply