upvote
> To the extent people trust AI to be infallible, it's just laziness and rapport (…) that causes people to assume that because it's useful and helpful for so many things, it'll be right about everything.

Why it happens is secondary to the fact that it does.

> The models all have disclaimers that state the inverse. People just gradually lose sight of that.

Those disclaimers are barely effective (if at all), and everyone knows that. Including the ones putting them there.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xj4aRhHJOWU

reply
> Where are you seeing people being told that AI is infallible? AI is being hyped to the moon, but "infallible" is not one of the claims.

I see all kinds of people being told that AI-based AI detection software used for detecting AI in writing is infallible!

You want to make sure people aren't using fallible AI? Use our AI to detect AI? What could possibly go wrong.

reply
Where did you see this claim about AI-based AI detection?
reply