> problem is posting those papers for broader dissemenation to the public, with titles suggesting to the public that cancer has been cured
replyFair enough. I'm thinking of cases where a good study that isn't turned into PR slop is dismissed because it was done in mice. Which is fine for most people. But not great if we're treating real science that way.
Dismissing good science is entirely the correct decision when the good science isn't ready for broad dissemination to the audience which it is being presented to.
reply