upvote
I'd argue this has not much in common with Jia Tan apart from both being supply chain attacks, there is no malicious maintainer here, a trusted maintainer had their account taken over.

I guess the end result is the same, a malicious package pushed by an account that was thought to be trusted, but I think the Jia Tan case is worth being looked at differently than just simple account takeover.

reply
It's just a longer backstory. All the same in the end. Hackers targeted a popular package. The lead maintainer was compromised. The pattern fits. There will be more of these.
reply