That people on this forum convinced themselves that it's a reasonable take to vibe code a useful geometric kernel is profoundly depressing.
replyIndeed. I would love for it to be true, but aside from opencascade^1 all the professional kernels are proprietary and not in the training set, so LLMs can't just regurgitate them.
reply^1: Which I really appreciate, but let's be real, it is far behind eg. parasolid.
Just wait for sometime, there will be one.
replyThere are many geniuses on HN for tacking up challenge
So you think AI can do this – why exactly is a genius needed?
replyCorrect me if I'm wrong, kernel is already there, and it's decent enough. What's lacking is a good user interface to it.
replyFreeCAD is perfectly good user interface for opencascade. The problem is that as your geometry gets more complicated you start running into the kernel limitations.
replydeleted
replydeleted
reply