Everything I have read is that the cddl is not compatible with binary deployments of zfs on linux so actually wouldnt that mean yes they could press that if you bundled it with gpl? Actual lawyers have said yes it could which is what I am refering to, however I think the actual answer is that Oracle has created a latch by inaction on this subject for so long now.
replyCDDL is more permissive than gpl. It's not a violation of cddl to intermingle with code under a different license. GPL is the issue and it's the individual contributors to linux that _could_ sue.
replyI'm not a lawyer. I don't k is what Oracle's lawyers can and can't do. Even if I'm legally in the right, Oracle's lawyers could break me if they wanted. I can't know if there is a ZFS grenade, and neither can you. But we can choose to not deal with Oracle.
replyAt that point, if they wanted to, they could sue mort96 for saying something bad about Oracle. It's unlikely they'll do that and perhaps a bit less unlikely they'll sue over ZFS.
replyMost of their legal shenanigans appear to be restricted to companies that already license some software from them.
We have pretty good laws and systems protecting our right to say something bad about companies. I trust that to protect me.
replyWe have less good laws and systems protecting our right to use software in ways which Oracle considers breach of license.
They can sue for a variety of reasons from trade secret to trademark.
replyIt doesn't mean they'll win anything in court but they'll ruin you long before they notice the spend.