Will be interesting to see if those still hold any weight (in the US at least) after the latest Meta rulings established defective design as a valid reason to sue big tech for damages
replyThat's not not set yet though. It hasn't made it to appeals yet.
replyProhibiting the user from using it for any commercial or business purposes is definitely new!
replyHave you really never seen any software saying "for non-commercial use only"?
replyWhen I'm paying for said software? No, I don't think I have.
replyOnly when it's a free/cheap consumer version of something with a pricey business version.
reply> Software in general has disclaimed any warranties or fitness for purpose
replyThis is not such a disclaimer. If Copilot fails its purpose of entertaining you, you can sue. /i
That's not what this is, though.
replyshow me any that have claimed that they were for entertainment purposes only. sql server has never had that in its EULA. The GPL does not say that the software is for entertainment purposes only.
replyWell, except that, in this case, Copilot really is for entertainment purposes only.
reply