upvote
Docker shares the host kernel, so a container escape lands on your box, and bubblewrap stays lighter but it leak edges if you leave seccomp or fs mounts loose.

Zerobox reads like a tool for per-command guardrails instead of image management. That trade looks saner for local runs, though it's new enough that I'd expect a few escapes before the rough egdes are gone.

reply
The text says that it uses OS-level tools, specifically bubble wrap on Linux.
reply
That's right. It uses the same kernel mechanisms as Docker, the runtime is different though (bwrap on linux, seatbelt on mac, etc.)
reply