upvote
Daniel, your work is changing the world. More power to you.

I setup a pipeline for inference with OCR, full text search, embedding and summarization of land records dating back 1800s. All powered by the GGUF's you generate and llama.cpp. People are so excited that they can now search the records in multiple languages that a 1 minute wait to process the document seems nothing. Thank you!

reply
Oh appreciate it!

Oh nice! That sounds fantastic! I hope Gemma-4 will make it even better! The small ones 2B and 4B are shockingly good haha!

reply
Hey in really interested in your pipeline techniques. I've got some pdfs I need to get processed but processing them in the cloud with big providers requires redaction.

Wondering if a local model or a self hosted one would work just as well.

reply
I run llama.cpp with Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct-Q4_K_S.gguf with mmproj-F16.gguf for OCR and translation. I also run llama.cpp with Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B-GGUF for embeddings. Drupal 11 with ai_provider_ollama and custom provider ai_provider_llama (heavily derived from ai_provider_ollama) with PostreSQL and pgvector.

People on site scan the documents and upload them for archival. The directory monitor looks for new files in the archive directories and once a new file is available, it is uploaded to Drupal. Once a new content is created in Drupal, Drupal triggers the translation and embedding process through llama.cpp. Qwen3-VL-8B is also used for chat and RAG. Client is familiar with Drupal and CMS in general and wanted to stay in a similar environment. If you are starting new I would recommend looking at docling.

reply
Disclaimer: I'm an AI novice relative to many here. FWIW last wknd I spent a couple hours setting up self-hosted n8n with ollama and gemma3:4b [EDIT: not Qwen-3.5], using PDF content extraction for my PoC. 100% local workflow, no runtime dependency on cloud providers. I doubt it'd scale very well (macbook air m4, measly 16GB RAM), but it works as intended.
reply
How do you extract the content? OCR? Pdf to text then feed into qwen?

I tried something similar where I needed a bunch of tables extracted from the pdf over like 40 pages. It was crazy slow on my MacBook and innacurate

reply
If you have a basic ARM MacBook, GLM-OCR is the best single model I have found for OCR over documents with good table extraction/formatting. It's a compact 0.9b parameter model, so it'll run on systems with only 8 GB of RAM.

https://github.com/zai-org/GLM-OCR

Use mlx-vlm for inference:

https://github.com/zai-org/GLM-OCR/blob/main/examples/mlx-de...

Then you can run a single command to process your PDF:

  glmocr parse example.pdf

  Loading images: example.pdf
  Found 1 file(s)
  Starting Pipeline...
  Pipeline started!
  GLM-OCR initialized in self-hosted mode
  Using Pipeline (enable_layout=true)...

  === Parsing: example.pdf (1/1) ===
My test document contains scanned pages from a law textbook. It's two columns of text with a lot of footnotes. It took 60 seconds to process 5 pages on a MBP with M4 Max chip.

After it's done, you'll have a directory output/example/ that contains .md and .json files. The .md file will contain a markdown rendition of the complete document. The .json file will contain individual labeled regions from the document along with their transcriptions. If you get all the JSON objects with

  "label": "table"
from the JSON file, you can get an HTML-formatted table from each "content" section of these objects.

It might still be inaccurate -- I don't know how challenging your original tables are -- but it shouldn't be terribly slow. The tables it produced for me were good.

I have also built more complex work flows that use a mixture of OCR-specialized models and general purpose VLM models like Qwen 3.5, along with software to coordinate and reconcile operations, but GLM-OCR by itself is the best first thing to try locally.

reply
Thanks! Just tried it on a 40 page pdf. Seems to work for single images but the large pdf gives me connection timeouts
reply
I also get connection timeouts on larger documents, but it automatically retries and completes. All the pages are processed when I'm done. However, I'm using the Python client SDK for larger documents rather than the basic glmocr command line tool. I'm not sure if that makes a difference.
reply
1. Correction: I'd planned to use Qwen-3.5 but ended up using gemma3:4b.

2. The n8n workflow passes a given binary pdf to gemma, which (based on a detailed prompt) analyzes it and produces JSON output.

See https://github.com/LinkedInLearning/build-with-ai-running-lo... if you want more details. :)

reply
Seconded, would also love to hear your story if you would be willing
reply
Hey, I tried to use Unsloth to run Gemma 4 locally but got stuck during the setup on Windows 11.

At some point it asked me to create a password, and right after that it threw an error. Here’s a screenshot: https://imgur.com/a/sCMmqht

This happened after running the PowerShell setup, where it installed several things like NVIDIA components, VS Code, and Python. At the end, PowerShell tell me to open a http://localhost URL in my browser, and that’s where I was prompted to set the password before it failed.

Also, I noticed that an Unsloth icon was added to my desktop, but when I click it, nothing happens.

For context, I’m not a developer and I had never used PowerShell before. Some of the steps were a bit intimidating and I wasn’t fully sure what I was approving when clicking through.

The overall experience felt a bit rough for my level. It would be great if this could be packaged as a simple .exe or a standalone app instead of going through terminal and browser steps.

Are there any plans to make something like that?

reply
Apologies we just fixed it!! If you try again from source ie

irm https://unsloth.ai/install.ps1 | iex

it should work hopefully. If not - please at us on Discord and we'll help you!

The Network error is a bummer - we'll check.

And yes we're working on a .exe!!

reply
deleted
reply
FYI, screenshot for the "Search and download Gemma 4" step on your guide is for qwen3.5, and when I searched for gemma-4 in Unsloth Studio it only shows Gemma 3 models.
reply
We're still updating it haha! Sorry! It's been quite complex to support new models without breaking old ones
reply
Speaking of which, do you think Step 3.5 Flash is going to happen or should I stop holding my breath?
reply
Hi! Do you ever make quants of the base models? I'm interested in experimenting with them in non-chat contexts.
reply
Thank you for your work.

You have an answer on your page regarding "Should I pick 26B-A4B or 31B?", but can you please clarify if, assuming 24GB vRAM, I should pick a full precision smaller model or 4 bit larger model?

reply
Try 26B first. 31B seems to have very heavy KV cache (maybe bugged in llama.cpp at the moment; 16K takes up 4.9GB).

edit: 31B cache is not bugged, there's static SWA cost of 3.6GB.. so IQ4_XS at 15.2GB seems like reasonable pair, but even then barely enough for 64K for 24GB VRAM. Maybe 8 bit KV quantization is fine now after https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/pull/21038 got merged, so 100K+ is possible.

> I should pick a full precision smaller model or 4 bit larger model?

4 bit larger model. You have to use quant either way -- even if by full precision you mean 8 bit, it's gonna be 26GB + overhead + chat context.

Try UD-Q4_K_XL.

reply
Yes UD-Q4_K_XL works well! :)
reply
what is the main difference between "normal" quants and the UD ones?
reply
They explain it here:

https://unsloth.ai/docs/basics/unsloth-dynamic-2.0-ggufs

For the best quality reply, I used the Gemma-4 31B UD-Q8_K_XL quant with Unsloth Studio to summarize the URL with web search. It produced 4.9 tok/s (including web search) on an MacBook Pro M1 Max with 64GB.

Here an excerpt of it's own words:

Unsloth Dynamic 2.0 Quantization

Dynamic 2.0 is not just a "bit-reduction" but an intelligent, per-layer optimization strategy.

- Selective Layer Quantization: Instead of making every layer 4-bit, Dynamic 2.0 analyzes every single layer and selectively adjusts the quantization type. Some critical layers may be kept at higher precision, while less critical layers are compressed more.

- Model-Specific Tailoring: The quantization scheme is custom-built for each model. For example, the layers selected for quantization in Gemma 3 are completely different from those in Llama 4.

- High-Quality Calibration: They use a hand-curated calibration dataset of >1.5M tokens specifically designed to enhance conversational chat performance, rather than just optimizing for Wikipedia-style text.

- Architecture Agnostic: While previous versions were mostly effective for MoE (Mixture of Experts) models, Dynamic 2.0 works for all architectures (both MoE and non-MoE).

reply
deleted
reply
Thank you!

I presume 24B is somewhat faster since it's only 4B activated - 31B is quite a large dense model so more accurate!

reply
This is one of the more confusing aspects of experimenting with local models as a noob. Given my GPU, which model should I use, which quantization of that model should I pick (unsloth tends to offer over a dozen!) and what context size should I use? Overestimate any of these, and the model just won't load and you have to trial-and-error your way to finding a good combination. The red/yellow/green indicators on huggingface.co are kind of nice, but you only know for sure when you try to load the model and allocate context.
reply
Definitely Unsloth Studio can help - we recommend specific quants (like Gemma-4) and also auto calculate the context length etc!
reply
Will have to try it out. I always thought that was more for fine-tuning and less for inference.
reply
Oh yes sadly we partially mis-communicated haha - there's both and synthetic data generation + exporting!
reply
Thank you and your brother for all the amazing work, it's really inspiring to others <3
reply
Thank you and appreciate it!
reply
Daniel, I know you might hear this a lot but I really appreciate a lot of what you have been doing at Unsloth and the way you handle your communication, whether within hackernews/reddit.

I am not sure if someone might have asked this already to you, but I have a question (out of curiosity) as to which open source model you find best and also, which AI training team (Qwen/Gemini/Kimi/GLM) has cooperated the most with the Unsloth team and is friendly to work with from such perspective?

reply
Thanks a lot for the support :)

Tbh Gemma-4 haha - it's sooooo good!!!

For teams - Google haha definitely hands down then Qwen, Meta haha through PyTorch and Llama and Mistral - tbh all labs are great!

reply
Now you have gotten me a bit excited for Gemma-4, Definitely gonna see if I can run the unsloth quants of this on my mac air & thanks for responding to my comment :-)
reply
Thanks! Have a super good day!!
reply
neat, time to update my spam filter model hehe
reply
Awesome!! Thank you SO much for this.
reply
Appreciate it!
reply