This is beyond what we're talking about though, you're referring to copyright infringement. I'm referring to an open source licensed software that ALLOWS commercial use, the only requirement is attribution.
replyYour example only makes sense if the company stole the code from a proprietary repo, like a hostile former employee.
All copyleft licenses are built on top of copyright law. That is their one and only enforcement strategy, by design. So we are in fact talking about the very same thing.
Here, read: https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2012/feb/01/gpl-enforcement/#...
replyThat analogy only works if there was a place you could signup for free to allow you to host and sell those files.
replyAs-is, it's so far off it's useless. Even though both situations involve copyright in some manner.
I again point out that ALL copyleft licenses are built on copyright, so my example is perfectly valid - one way or another it is copyright infringement,
replyhttps://sfconservancy.org/blog/2012/feb/01/gpl-enforcement/#...
What am I supposed to say here. I already acknowledged that and said it's not good enough to make the analogy work. If you repeat that point with no elaboration, you're basically just saying "nuh uh".
reply