upvote
Isn't that basically the plotline of the Blackhawk Down movie?

And, more importantly, the real-life events on which it's based?

reply
Exactly what happens to me in Kerbel Space Program.

Rescue team for the rescue team.

reply
Did you tactically forgot to put parachute on the landing pod? Or run out of fuel mid mission?
reply
The first time I ever attempted a rescue mission in KSP, I ended up stranding 5 different kerbals in various orbita nearby trying to get the first one, and of course every one was a bigger and more complicated craft trying to save as many kerbals as possible. Eventually I just gave up and put a giant cross memorial in orbit, part as a reference to Neon Genesis Evangelion, and part as a memorial to the like 6 kerbals I left stranded in space.
reply
Slaps car, thsi baby can fit soo many rescue teams in it
reply
The US did it all the time in Vietnam.
reply
And it did sometimes get way out of control: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rescue_of_Bat_21_Bravo
reply
That's an example of things getting out of control.
reply
Possibly the best example
reply
Not sure if it was actually used, but a fun idea for pilot recovery..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiller_ROE_Rotorcycle

reply
…against the viet cong, where the biggest risk was the pilot getting pierced from small arms fire (in addition to the helo going down from pilot error). Quite different from the anti-air weapons modern day Iran possesses.
reply
Are you aware that hundreds of American fixed wing aircraft were lost to surface to air missiles in North Vietnam? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._aircraft_losses_t...
reply
Ah yeah, well I didn’t know it was that high!

But I’m responding to the rescue mission comment, which, since Vietnam, have overwhelmingly employed helicopters (Huey’s then, Black Hawks today). But machinery aside, the larger point is that air operations will likely go worse here than they did in Vietnam, unfortunately for both sides.

reply
Or a MiG-17 that could outrate your F-4/F-105 at every subsonic flight regime.
reply