> The new military service law requires all men under 45 to seek approval from the Bundeswehr to leave the country for longer than three months. It also obliges the military career center to issue it.
replyNew. Not cold war. This didn't exist before.
It's a re-instatement of a cold war era law that was suspended in 2011.
replyThe point is not when the law originated, but that it's being reinstated.
replyOkay sure, but I didnt say otherwise. I was just correcting someone who said something untrue.
replyThe main point was that they changed it so instead of being activated during crisis now it applies anytime, including in peacetime. Making it similar to the cold war provisions doesn't make it sounds better.
replyNo, the one that said it was only activated during crisis was the post 2011 version.
replySeems like a distinction without a difference to me.
replyIt's an important distinction because it prevents the defence of "oh it's just an old law, there are lots of old laws on the books that everyone knows aren't relevant, they can't be tidied up for political reasons".
replyIt was suspended for the last 15 years! Surely it was easier to leave it suspended and unsuspending it is a conscious choice.
deleted
replyPreviously it was conditional, only in effect “in the event of tension or defense” (machine translation) which I will define below, but they are very exceptional circumstances -- AFAIK not ever invoked since unification.
replyThe change this year was to make it applicable regardless of those conditions: “Outside the tension or defense case, §§ 3 [...]” shall apply.
"Tension" is defined by an imminent threat (e.g., invasion) and must be explicitly invoked by leadership. "Defense" is actual ongoing attack of territory, and must be explicitly invoked by the Bundestag.
I have used https://www.fr.de/politik/drastische-wehrpflicht-aenderung-m... to form my understanding. Can be read freely by prepending archive.is/newest/ to the URL.