OP: "I'm a victim of the state, so I should be allowed to victimize women."
replyHe was about to drop truly groundbreaking theory, I assure you. No one has ever heard that bit before.
Well, 2 wrongs make one right, don't they?!
I wish we'd first fix women's rights and then extend their duties. What the OP does is just egoistically trying to make other groups also suffer.
reply> I wish we'd first fix women's rights and then extend their duties.
reply"We'll get around to it when some arbitrary measure is met, we promise"
This is the same thing you're criticising - using one injustice to justify another.
I don't have intentions to justify an injustice. I'm saying why should we try to make it even harder for a disadvantaged group? It does not help a single German man if women also have to comply to this law.
Fixing women's rights on the other hand gives everybody the benefit of living in a society that is more fair. For me, that's a valuable goal.
replyWomen vote, and pressure politicians into continuing a war that they will never have to fight themselves. Many such cases.
replyCan you show me a recent war in a democracy where women had greater percentage of supporting a war than men?
replyYou may claim not to have the intention, but materially, it's what you're doing.
replyEveryone doesn't get drafted at once. It stands to reason that drafting women would mean fewer men were needed.
I am not railing against anyone. I am simply pointing out the fact.
replyIt’s not a fact though. I support the draft for women. For me, that’s what feminism is. I’m sure you can point out some feminists that are only for drafting men, but that’s not what you stated, you stated a patent falsehood, dressed up as a “fact” so you could dunk on feminism.
reply