upvote
What is wrong in that quoted sentence? Do you mean "articulacy" should instead be "articulateness"? "Articulacy" is also a word, and correct in this context.
reply
Articulation. The lens of articulation. Or otherwise, "eloquence;" the lens of eloquence.

LLMs ain't gonna do sheeeeeeeit if this is still where we are at...

reply
deleted
reply
That would not fit as well.
reply
I have terrible news for you. Linguistics is descriptive, not prescriptive. We will torment you with word game playing until such time as you loosen up.
reply
The torment is evidently yours [0]. However, I am ecstatic you reveal your own inner turbulence, which I have deliberately engineered.

By the way, how are those food prices working out for ya bud [1]? I understand that you are struggling, but please try not to get, quote, "violent".

Pause. Empathize. Apologize. Then post.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639747

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636685

reply
> But a sufficiently skilled communicator can absolutely articulate many of the factors being evaluated when they judge a situation and how their descision-making process works

That sounds right but I suspect it is wrong. Watching smart intuition has been a personal interest of mine for years. Few people avoid the manifold traps.

1: people hallucinate their reasoning or are self-deceptive (or even intentionally deceptive). Watching AI has helped hone watching people.

2: you need to be sufficiently close in skills and language for someone to be able to communicate the nuances. E.g. sportspeople.

3: Judging whether an intuitive statement is true is hardhard. We need to identify a correct intuition (and ignore incorrect intuitions) before judging whether some explanation is valid.

reply