upvote
It seems to be for the first version, judging by the use of the original names, which is odd because the review's from this year.

The rewrite definitely improves on the ending and its delivery, but it's still largely the same plot, so it may not address all of your issues.

reply
The author’s other stories like Ra and Fine Structure have the same issue, in my opinion. He has interesting ideas, but cannot seem to write an ending.
reply
This review appears to be of the first version despite the recent date. (The rewrite filed the serial numbers off the SCP references and changed character names both for copyright reasons and to provide a degree of separation from the original.)

I read both versions and agree that the second half of the first version was very abstract and difficult to follow. While I would consider the first half of the new version more edited than rewritten, the second half got a significant overhaul which fixed almost all of my issues with it and made for (in my opinion) a much more satisfying ending. I would recommend giving the new version another chance, though those who read the first version may find the new character names distracting. (Most didn't bother me, but Marion Wheeler -> Marie Quinn never felt quite right.)

reply
The article says:

"And at the top of the food chain sits SCP-3125 (renamed in the published edition, but the designation is so perfect I am using it anyway) ..."

reply
I had the opposite reaction. The second half was garbage, but the first half was so good and original I'd recommend it just for that.
reply
Same! I just finished the book a few days ago. The first half is really good, a cool premise and interesting story. The second half just got a bit too weird for me and by the final chapter I was happy it was finished lol.
reply
I liked piecing the story together in the SCP wiki.

Later I read the first version of the book and it was okay, but the vibes were a bit lost.

The new version of the book I didn't even finish.

reply
> the first half was good and that the second half felt clunky

> The second half was garbage, but the first half was so good

so you had the same reaction?

reply
> To the point where i don’t recommend it to anyone

> but the first half was so good and original I'd recommend it just for that

Attension span so short you couldn't even make it to the second half of the sentence before dismissing it

reply
I think this comment is unnecessarily harsh.

To anyone confused (like me), the commenters above had opposite recommendations despite having similar opinions of the book.

reply
They were being snarky about a comment when they literally didn't read the entire sentences they were being snarky about. No, I don't think I was unnecessarily harsh.
reply
fair enough, i guess my brain got stuck on reconciling the first thing that i whiffed on the differing recommendations lol
reply
The first few chapters of that book are some of the coolest I've ever read. I agree it really drops off in the second half, but would still recommend it to people.
reply
The rewrite is excellent
reply