> I feel somebody better qualified should write

I hate to be rude in a setting like this, but please at least research the things you're sure about/prognosticating on.

> the same way, they are generally capable but until we get the robots and a more reliable interface between model and real world, one needs human feet (and hands) in the lab.

Honestly, the kinds of labs where 'bioweapons' would be made are the least dependent on human intervention.

You need someone to monitor your automated cell incubating system, make sure your pipetting / PCR robots are doing fine and then review the data.

----

What do you are you trying to achieve in your example? This is all gobbldey-gook for someone who actually sees real, live cancer patients.