upvote

points

by zarzavat1 days ago |
comments
upvoteby jraph1 days ago|
next
[-]
It's not that easy.

I agree that supporting Windows helps its ecosystem.

But also open source software on Windows is an important gateway to the free world. When you are already used to Firefox, LibreOffice and VLC, you might as well switch to Linux painlessly, but if those didn't run on Windows, switching to Linux would require relearning everything.

reply
upvoteby estimator72921 days ago|
parent|
[-]
Irrelevant. If it's time to stop using windows, all those windows users will have to relearn everything either way. Whether they do it in a windows environment or a linux one doesn't really change the equation.

A sudden lack of software on windows will increase user migration. If we all keep publishing for windows, users will just stay there because their needs are already met.

reply
upvoteby yjftsjthsd-h1 days ago|
parent|
[-]
> If it's time to stop using windows, all those windows users will have to relearn everything either way.

No, that's the thing; they ideally would only need to replace the OS. Many long years ago, when I switched from Windows to Ubuntu (this was back when it was good), part of why it was so easy is because I mostly kept the same applications. If you use eg. Firefox, VLC, open/libreoffice, audacity, etc., then you can install a new OS, reinstall the same applications, and barely have to change anything. That's huge.

reply
upvoteby account4223 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
I agree to some extend but we (or at least I) publish open source software (amongst other reasons) because I like helping others and it so happens that most users that could benefit are still using Windows so it doesn't feel right to stop doing that as long as the effort is reasonable (which it is, unlike for macOS).
reply