What's the relevance here? Some sort of weird "Ha! Gotcha!" I'm certainly aware of code to SQL and SQL to code generators as generalized techniques, but I've not used SQL to code generators because these are not practical for most teams in the domain spaces where I operate.

Your original quote, verbatim:

    > Eg compare to strongly-typed query generators

"strongly-typed query generators" not "strongly-typed command generators" nor "strongly-typed code generators".

EF is precisely a code to structured query language (SQL) query generator and not a query to code generator.