undefined

points

[-]

Sorry, we have not tested on Fedora before release. Did not expect so much interest in the first hours after release...

I have now installed Fedora in a VM (ARM64 architecture, though) and it does load, but cannot identify processes. I'm investigating this now.

The other issue seems to be with eBPF compatibility. That's a moving target and I'll investigate next. But resources are limited, I'll need some time to dig into this.

by supernes11 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

There's some good feedback in the GitHub issue on the subject, seems to happen on slightly newer versions of the kernel than the one you've tested on and affects other distros like Arch as well. I'll keep an eye on the discussion and test again once updates are ready.

by whilenot-dev13 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

Someone already created an issue for it: https://github.com/obdev/littlesnitch-linux/issues/1

by pixelat3d9 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

From the download page on the website:

"Note: Little Snitch version 1.0.0 does not currently work with the Btrfs file system! Btrfs is used by default on Fedora, so Little Snitch does not currently identify processes on Fedora. We are working on an 1.0.1 release to fix the issue as soon as possible!"

by S0und13 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

I was looking for a comment like yours. Same issue, in my case only eating up half of my cores but with 100% utilization, webUI not working.

by aucisson_masque12 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

Your average Linux experience.

And the second most upvoted comment is someone seriously asking if 2026 if the year of Linux desktop...

by Latty12 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

Yeah, because no third party program has ever crashed on any other OS.

Come on, this is an absurd comment. Linux has its issues, this is not a serious example of what is keeping normal people from using Linux as a desktop OS. Normal people are not installing the first release of a privacy networking tool that requires you to OK connections.

by aucisson_masque12 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

99,9% of the time, you download an exe or a DMG, you can be pretty sure it's going to work. Even 3 star github repo.

Only on Linux you get weird bug, compilation issues, etc.

After all, you have windows, macos and then you have Linux : debian, Ubuntu, fedora, arch, opensuse. That's almost like 5 different os just for Linux.

Sure you can use flatpack and force people to download 2gb installation for something that requires 20mb on windows and macos. That excludes all of the people who don't have fiber internet.

At this point I'm convinced that those developing Linux don't want it to be an os for casuals and prefer to stay in their small, niche community. That's fine by me but it makes claim of Linux desktop year laughable, which I was referring to.

by groguzt8 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

The take on flatpaks is such an uninformed one. DMGs on MacOS come with all the dependencies bundled in, which make them essentially just as big as the comparable flatpak (minus the shared runtime that gets installed once)

by eiginn7 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

Seriously, the amount flatpak misinformation that people hold onto is absolutely wild. Ex: I have had to show people it does differential updates because they don't bother to read the output.

Flatpaks are easily the best gui desktop app experience for users we have today.

by Latty12 hours ago|

parent|

prev|

[-]

That's not the user experience though, the user experience is it says "go to the discover app and install <program>" and they do that and it just works. Downloading a tarball is not the normal way to install stuff on Linux, and given everyone has phones where the standard is "install on the app store", it's hardly some new experience, in fact, it's more natural for normal users.

by adammarples12 hours ago|

parent|

prev|

[-]

This is brand new open source software with like 3 stars on github