upvote
Does anyone seriously think EFF posting to X yesterday tarnished their brand? Be real.
reply
The advertisers that evaporated and left behind a lot of no label dropshipping scams seem to think so. Did a lot of them eventually come back because there is some audience to squeeze numbers from? Sure, but I also wouldn't negate that many didn't and aren't coming back because it is Elon's playground now.
reply
Yes, people do in fact judge others for their associations.

If you don't that is fine but I imagine you would also hold the view that not posting on X shouldn't be controversial then either.

reply
My neighbor blares Fox in their kitchen every day. I view them with the same flavor of suspicion as someone who posts there.
reply
Yeah, I do. People & brands having a link to an X account is a huge red flag. It's a public statement that you support child pornography and the end of democracy in the US. That's going to tarnish a brand pretty majorly.
reply
Yes, absolutely. The CEO of X did Nazi salutes and promotes white genocide narratives, Grok has created posts praising Hitler, and when people used Grok to publicly generate CSAM for free, they fixed it by putting it behind a subscription platform. The only people I know and respect who are still on X are sex workers, because X is still the most porn-friendly social media site.

When you say "Be real", you're pleading with people to take your statement more seriously. But it's simply the case that people have very strong and negative opinions about nazis and child pornography.

reply
some of the things you believe aren't true, no matter how strongly you believe them
reply
I do, yeah. Hope that helps!
reply
Yes.

I applaud the move and only wish they would have done it sooner.

reply
Not really, this is the kind of argument you only ever see on Reddit/HN, normal people don't care.
reply
Who is "normal" in this context? Because people who support the EFF's mission are pretty clued into what is happening and do care.
reply
All dozen bloosky users have been sure to chime in as well.
reply
Going against the network effect out of principal doesn't seem to be a winning strategy when the goal is to raise awareness about issues.
reply
That is idiotic.
reply