It reminds me of something I read on mastodon: "genie doesn't go back in the bottle say AI promoters while the industry spends a trillion dollars a year to try to keep the genie out of the bottle"
replyDo you think the genie will go back in the bottle and why?
replyIt's certainly possible. All that is required is for AIs to become more expensive than humans. Developing projects on a $100 Claude Code subscription is a lot of fun. I bet people would simply go back to hiring human developers if that subscription cost $10,000 instead.
replyAdapting implies you are still a part of the environment though. AI is on a trajectory to replace you and take you out of the environment.
replyAI is on a trajectory to replace people who do not effectively use AI with people that do
replyThat is the bait and switch. The end goal is that you are out of the equation. Your perceived effectiveness at using AI as an exchange of labor diminishes over time to the point that you become irrelevant.
replyWho has that end goal?? Who is going to direct the AI if only the CEO is left in the organization? The CEO will never actually do it , and will always need someone who can and will do it. I just can’t see a grand plan to take humans out of the equation entirely.
replythat most definitely is a plan, make no mistake about it. but as mike tyson famously said, “every has a plan until they get punched in a mouth” :)
replythis is certainly a possibility but human beings and societies as a whole adapt
reply> Social media has never been seen as a universal positive force?
replyYou missed the whole arab spring thing?
If you selectively read one sentence of my comment, you risk missing the forest for the trees. I don't have any particular knowledge on the arab spring so I won't comment on that but I quite clearly said that technology has good and bad aspects to it.
replyIs it meant as sarcasm?
reply