This is kind-of neat too, at least in the near term:
reply> In the coming weeks, we will relicense all of our source-available tools, including Tart, Vetu and Orchard under a more permissive license. We have also stopped charging licensing fees for them.
That part is amazing. Back when I first heard of tart I thought it was amazing, with the one downside being the license.
replyHopefully development on it continues, or a community maintained version keeps it going.
This is making my current work 100 times easier. Very welcome timing.
replyThis is a huge deal! I secretly hoped for this. :)
replyThis is awesome because I flippin love tart.
replyJust want to note that we will continue maintaining and improving our virtualization solutions actually with even greater attention. SaaS options like Cirrus CI and Cirrus Runners will eventually wind down so we can focus on incorporating pieces internally.
replyWhat are your plans for tart licensing going forward?
replyYou’ll be pleasantly surprised. Updates in the coming weeks.
reply> In the coming weeks, we will relicense all of our source-available tools, including Tart, Vetu and Orchard under a more permissive license. We have also stopped charging licensing fees for them.
MIT or Apache2 or FreeBSD licenses would be preferable in my case, but GPLv2 or even AGPLv3 (if you have to) would work.
replyIf you’re taking requests…
That sounds like a British phrase for pimping.
replyIf your scope includes making the Codex web app environments have additional functionality I look forward to it. More enterprise features and yaml backed pipelines.
replyIf you are interested in yaml backed pipelines check out this open source tool I built for exactly this purpose:
replyFor now.
replyI mostly clicked the link because I was curious if Cirrus Labs operates Cirrus CI and if so how that would be impacted.
replyLooks like I’ll need to move the FreeBSD CI jobs for open source projects I maintain to another solution. Anyone have suggestions for alternatives?
It could also be a suite of product acquisition, the CI could be a product OpenAI is interested in having, but not sell.
replyYeah. Much like Astral - acquiring both the product (because they need to use it internally, but don't care about trying to resell / market), and they also want the talent to keep maintaining it / add features they want.
replyIs Sam or family an investor in them anyways?
replyWe were 100% bootstrapped with no outside capital or support/advisory.
replydeleted
reply