upvote
Because it doesn't make a difference, because `SELECT 1` doesn't need to touch the database:

    Running 100,000 `SELECT 1` queries:
    PostgreSQL (localhost): 2.71 seconds
    SQLite (in-memory): 0.07 seconds
    SQLite (tempfile): 0.07 seconds
(https://gist.github.com/leifkb/d8778422d450d9a3f103ed43258cc...)
reply
Why are you doing meaningless microbenchmarks?
reply
> Because it doesn't make a difference, because `SELECT 1` doesn't need to touch the database:

I hope you understand that your claim boils down to stating that SQLite is faster at doing nothing at all, which is a silly case to make.

reply
The original claim being discussed is about the overhead of an in-process database vs. a database server in a separate process, not about whether SQLite or PostgreSQL have a faster database engine.
reply