Stock install, no tuning.

  $uname -r
  6.8.0-107-generic
  $ollama --version
  ollama version is 0.20.2
  $ollama run "gemma4:31b" --verbose "write fizzbuzz in python."
  [...]
  total duration:       45.141599637s
  load duration:        143.633498ms
  prompt eval count:    21 token(s)
  prompt eval duration: 48.047609ms
  prompt eval rate:     437.07 tokens/s
  eval count:           1057 token(s)
  eval duration:        44.676612241s
  eval rate:            23.66 tokens/s

I have a dual R9700 machine, with both cards on PCIe gen4 x8 slots. The 256bit GDDR6 memory bandwidth is the main limiting factor and makes dense models above 9b fairly slow.

The model that is currently loaded full time for all workloads on this machine is Unsloth's Q3_K_M quant of Qwen 3.5 122b, which has 10b active parameters. With almost no context usage it will generate 59 tok/sec. At 10,000 input tokens it will prefill at about 1500 tok/sec and generate at 51 tok/sec. At 110,000 input tokens it will prefill at about 950 tok/sec and generate at 30 tok/sec.

Smaller MoE models with 3b active will push 70 tok/sec at 10,000 context. Dense models like Qwen 3.5 27b and Devstral Small 2 at 24b will only generate at around 13 - 15 tok/sec with 10,000 context.

This is all on llama.cpp with the Vulkan backend. I didn't get to far in testing / using anything that requires ROCm because there is an outstanding ROCm bug where the GPU clock stays at 100% (and drawing like 60 watts) even when the model is not processing anything. The issue is now closed but multiple commenters indicate it is still a problem. Using the Vulkan backend my per-card idle draw is between 1 and 2 watts with the display outputs shut down and no kernel frame buffer.