> Once I told it that ChatGPT have already done this, finished successfully.
replyTIL you can taunt LLMs. I guess they exhibit more competitive spirit than I thought.
Opus seems to be wired currently to get you to spend more money. Once you tell it "Stop defrauding me, just get to the right solution" it often gets it.
replyI am like "Yeah ok, use the Arcee Trinity models!" and its like, you got it boss, 3 opus agents in parallel, got it!
replyI always start the chat with "we have been going in circles" before giving any context.
reply[dead]
replyI copy and pasted the abstract into DeepSeek and asked your question. It's a bit unfair to penalise it for not knowing PDFs.
replyIt got a result.
If you like creating such things, consider contributing to Terminal Bench Science, https://www.tbench.ai/news/tb-science-announcement.
replyI changed the prompt to this:
reply""" Consider a mathematical function EML defined as `eml(x,y)=exp(x)−ln(y)`
Please produce `sin(x)/x` as a composition on EMLs and constant number 1 (one). """
[dead]
replymeta.ai in instant mode gets it first try too (I think?)
reply``` 2x + y = \operatorname{eml}\Big(1,\; \operatorname{eml}\big(\operatorname{eml}(1,\; \operatorname{eml}(\operatorname{eml}(1,\; \operatorname{eml}(\operatorname{eml}(L_2 + L_x, 1), 1) \cdot \operatorname{eml}(y,1)),1)\big),1\big)\Big) ```
for me Gemini hallucinated EML to mean something else despite the paper link being provided: "elementary mathematical layers"
this should be a tangential proof for the dying bunch of people who still believe that LLMs are just parrots. EML are literally a new invention
replySo what is the correct answer?
reply