upvote

points

by semiquaver1 days ago |
comments
upvoteby tptacek1 days ago|
next
[-]
It's so firmly established that, just like crypto, making a stink about it says more about the objector. I don't like it either! "Cyber" is cringe, and "crypto" should mean "cryptography". But I'm not the king of usage, and both those terms have new meanings.
reply
upvoteby strogonoff1 days ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Each time I see “cyber” used in a headline (so far it happened once) without any other hints that it’s about security, I am initially confused. What is wrong with the term “infosec”, exactly? Clear, logical, well-known and most widely used term to mean—you guessed it—information security.

There does not have to be a term committee or term police for colloquial use, but to me referring to somebody calling it out when terminology makes no sense as “making a stink” says something about the objector.

reply
upvoteby halJordan1 days ago|
parent|
[-]
Cyber expands way past infosec. And that's the crux of the problem with the complainers these days. You don't understand the full picture. You've convinced yourself you do. And so you tilt at windmills like an idiot.
reply
upvoteby semiquaver1 days ago|
parent|
[-]
Ok, what’s cyber to you?
reply
upvoteby foobarian1 days ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
At least this site managed to not get shut down because it appears to foster timely communication to cybercriminals :D
reply
upvoteby spacechild11 days ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
Is it really? I actually didn't understand the headline because I have never seen "cyber" been used this way. It's pretty stupid and I think we have all the rights to push back.
reply
upvoteby z5001 days ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
At least we hardly ever have to hear anyone say "cyberspace" anymore
reply
upvoteby dmurray1 days ago|
prev|
next
[-]
Wanna cyber?
reply
upvoteby MWil1 days ago|
parent|
[-]
only if we crypto first
reply
upvoteby DocTomoe1 days ago|
prev|
next
[-]
As an old school hacker ... I feel your pain.

Words change meaning all the time. I vividly remember when 'coder' was used as a diminutive, much like the later script-kiddie or code-monkey - "A software developer of little skill or knowledge". Today, people habitually call themselves that.

reply
upvoteby zarzavat1 days ago|
parent|
next
[-]
The way I always understood it is that "coder" is a broad term that includes writing non-turing complete languages like HTML and CSS as well as turing complete languages, whereas the term "programmer" is more specific to writing executable code.

Nowadays I'm not sure anyone is employed writing only HTML and CSS but in the 90s and 00s it was definitely a distinction worth making.

reply
upvoteby halJordan1 days ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
The irony of calling yourself a hacker while complaining about new words being cringe when hacker is the epitome and grandfather of all cringe names in this domain.
reply
upvoteby jjtheblunt1 days ago|
prev|
[-]
"order of magnitude" seems to also be silly-speak very often, trying to sound more technical than "ten times".

i suppose it is similar to "exponentially" being used when it doesn't mean exponentially.

reply
upvoteby dvfjsdhgfv1 days ago|
parent|
[-]
> "order of magnitude" seems to also be silly-speak very often, trying to sound more technical than "ten times".

But these are two different things. If I hear "ten times" I assume the person actually means ten times; when they say "an order of magnitude", I'm aware they might mean 8 or 12.

reply
upvoteby jjtheblunt1 days ago|
parent|
[-]
agreed...thought of that after writing it, and thanks for noting it too.

i thought the order of magnitude is often hipster phrasing, even on HN at times, but, when actually intended, it's like saying floor(log_base10( whatever )), so the ten times thing would have to be "roughly ten times" for example, to be comparable.

Also, in some contexts the base isn't presumed to be 10, of course, though around here in loose jargon that's usually what folks are saying.

reply