Additionally, one can argue that the state of the world has changed enough that assumptions made by the USC at the time of precedence require reversal.
replyonly in a new case ....
replyThe court is stacked with so called originalists - history stopped in the eighteenth century.
replyidk, they wouldn't have given the president nearly absolute immunity back then..
replyYes, they are insincere "originalists". This is known.
reply