upvote
That's not a fix. It's a workaround.
reply
It's a fix because it completely solves the issue on any site, without requiring changes from LinkedIn or any other actor.
reply
My car leaks oil. So I refill it here and there. This fixes issue with any car maker and does not require action of any other actor.
reply
Yes, it’s a workaround because it doesn’t require anyone to fix the issue.
reply
>it completely solves the issue on any site

It doesn't solve the problem with Instagram links, which in my experience do the following:

1) Open a new browser tab, with no history. 2) Close the original tab, so I can't easily get back to where I was.

reply
That's a different kind of dysfunction, though. You can address it by copying the link and pasting it in a new tab, or if that's not possible, copying the current page to a new tab and clicking on the link there.
reply
I've noticed that on Instagram, too. Absolutely infuriating.
reply
It's a work around to them making changes to deliberately change the expected results of pressing "back"
reply
It's also not a very effective workaround, because some of the websites in question end up spamming multiple instances of their home page in the history stack.
reply
You can usually address this by going back as far as possible, then holding the button again so more of the history shows up. And IME, it's only really broken sites that have this problem in the first place.
reply
Yes, but that's super annoying and at that point graduates to being a shitty workaround.
reply
The fix is to not to implement anti-user patterns. What you're describing is a loophole around it.
reply
> The fix is to not to implement anti-user patterns.

That's not a fix the user can implement themselves. Holding down the back button is comparatively trivial.

reply
Why on Earth would the user be expected to implement a fix for a problem they didn't cause themselves in the first place?
reply
Why the Earth should the user not want to implement a fix/workaround/whatever for a problem they didn't cause themselves but can trivially solve?
reply
Because I expect my browser to work for me instead of having memorize workarounds for the new web annoyance of the day.

Clicking "back", noticing that the site broke it, moving the mouse and long-pressing "back" (I normally navigate with a mouse thumb button or a trackpad gesture) is much more annoying than my browser just preventing this from happening in the first place.

reply
deleted
reply